|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
whatev I guess.
Last edited by EtherealCreature; 26.4.2008 at 4:46 pm. Reason: ... |
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
oh lol. ya i didnt mean to get so worked up. im just hella conservative in the way that i think people should have a lot more respect for themselves and their surroundings these days.
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Is finding more ways to wear less creativity? If so I support fully support creativity. Actually I'm slightly kidding, at some point some girls just do seem to be slutt'n it up. |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Truthfully I don't think it matters. That is there choice to dress that way. If they are comfortable dressing like that it's their decision.
We all talk about how accepting we are but we continue to bash on these girls because of what they wear? Just again, its their choice, you don't have to dress like that . You don't have to stare at them, I have yet to see ptots ruin a rave or swamp it, so to me its a nonissue.-Drifter |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think this same thing about everyone bashing the hyphy scene. They like their THIZZ one way we like our extacy the others...
|
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
They aren't harming us, not bringing down the scene at all, they just feel comfortable in the little amounts of clothing they wear. Who are we to say they cant not wear clothes...Just make sure you don't find yourself hooking up with some major jailbait. Maybe make them wear a name tag with birthdate on it or something.
If they start to become a problem, then we can do something about it. But for now, let them be naked or whatever they want. |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
-is particularly young -braces are a plus (no offense to those with braces) -basically wears lingerie to a rave (this can get tricky, because what constitutes lingerie? i'm gonna say: bra = lingerie, bra-like shirt, but not an actual bra = clothes [if it has sleeves, it's not lingerie]. if i can distinctly see what your ass looks like, it's lingerie, not pants. non-lingerie items can also count, such as mid-pubic hair-level skirts [like what christina aguilera wore in her "dirrty" video] and shorts that look like underwear but are actually called "shorts.") -if she's wearing pants, like actual PANTS, the likelihood of ptotness is significantly lowered. in other ptot threads, i've noticed that the definition gets stretched a bit. i do think that age plays a large part in the definition, because i think that if you're of age, you have the right to flaunt what you've got (tastefully, of course) and not merit the "ptot" badge. also, tastelessness is a defining characteristic, too. that's just my interpretation. thoughts? |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Eh what ever. I don't really care. I kind of enjoy a who gives a fuck atmosphere once a week.
|
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
I totally agree with drifter and juiceboxx. I have heard the term thrown around so much I got confused what it actually meant. It is a little counterdicting(i cant spell) to be about love and unity and then bash peoples clothing or lack there of. On that note Im outta here
![]() |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
i think im gonna go to taste test in my speedo....
|
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
Klover is a Ptot
![]() |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|