Thread: Hancock
View Single Post
  #12  
Old 7.7.2008, 4:42 am
gopher gopher is offline
Favorite Music: all types ^o^
 
Last Online: Today 3:16 am
Join Date: January 2008
Location: Los Angeles // Culver City
Posts: 1,663
Send a message via AIM to gopher Send a message via MSN to gopher Send a message via Yahoo to gopher
Default Re: Hancock

imo, hancock was terrible.. The previews hyped it up to be what it wasnt, the "bad" guy was terribly boring and had no super powers, the action was dull and lame, the comedy was okay for the first 1/2. The movie had alot of potential but they failed to deliver. I suggest not wasting money on this film and watch it at www.watch-movies.net or downloading a version of it :P

im guessing these are the reasons it got such god awful ratings.



i did see Wall-E tonight though that movie was freaking amazing.. :O visually stunning, well written plot, great story.

Quote:
Originally Posted by NBravekid View Post
this film was butchered by the studio... MPAA kept giving it an R rating, so the studio chopped about 40 minutes off to turn it into a Pg-13 generic action movie... wait for the directors cut to see the film how it was truly meant to be!!
the rated R version isnt going to change much of the story which is what made it real bad =P, it will show more violence and cursing which may make it look cooler to hide how awful the movie really was.. but meh ..

Last edited by gopher; 7.7.2008 at 4:43 am.. Reason: automerged doublepost
Reply With Quote